Clarifying the decision, the Ministry of Minority Affairs said it was responding to concerns raised across media platforms regarding the fare hike.

“Airlines had initially sought an increase of USD 300–400 per pilgrim due to the sharp rise in ATF prices, a global factor beyond the control of any government,” the ministry said in a statement on X.

It added that following extensive negotiations and consultations with stakeholders, the government approved a one-time increase of only USD 100 per pilgrim, irrespective of embarkation point, thereby reducing the potential burden by USD 200–300 per pilgrim.

“This is not exploitation. It is an effort to absorb pressure and protect pilgrims from a far larger financial impact,” the ministry said, adding that the process was transparent and aimed at ensuring that Haj 2026 operations for over one lakh registered pilgrims proceed without disruption.

Imran: Rijiju;

The ministry also noted that private tour operators had already revised fares sharply and, in some cases, imposed an additional increase of around USD 150.

Kiren Rijiju said Haj is a once-in-a-lifetime aspiration for many families. “Amid a sharp global rise in ATF prices driven by geopolitical tensions, airlines sought a steep hike. Through negotiations, we ensured the increase was restricted to just USD 100, saving each pilgrim a significant amount,” he said on X.

However, opposition leaders criticised the move. Asaduddin Owaisi termed the hike “exploitation” and called for the circular to be withdrawn, urging a refund for pilgrims.

Imran Pratapgarhi also criticised the decision, saying imposing an additional ₹10,000 charge ahead of the pilgrimage was unjust, particularly for families who save for years to undertake the journey.